Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review evaluates multimodal depression detection in clinical management, suggesting improvements for practice.
The effective management of depression—a high-prevalence mental disorder defined by persistent low mood and complex psychosomatic symptoms—poses a significant global challenge. It is necessary to conduct objective, multi-source assessments throughout the entire depression management cycle (DMC), from early screening to long-term prognosis. Multimodal depression detection (MMDD) has emerged as a critical enabling technology that leverages artificial intelligence (AI) to integrate these multi-source data streams. We conducted a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant search across major digital libraries (2015–2025; through Oct 23, 2025) and included 162 studies, synthesizing the technical pipeline—datasets, feature engineering, models, and fusion strategies. To unify fragmented perspectives, we introduce the AI–driven depression management cycle (AI-DMC), which maps MMDD applications onto two task paradigms: low-fidelity, large-scale monitoring (screening, prognosis) and high-fidelity, high-precision detection (diagnosis support, treatment assessment). Grounded in AI-DMC, we outline a clinically oriented roadmap and identify system-level gaps—data and annotation ecosystems, trustworthy fusion and interpretability, and translation from monitoring to clinical action—providing forward-looking guidance for research and deployment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: