This article examines a corpus of popular pseudohistorical claims on the Chinese internet, such as the claim that the Han people are the descendants of a divine race that once held global primacy, and that they are awakening to restore order from Western civilizations that ended their hegemony and concealed the history, etc. I analyze them as a textual formation with a distinct grammar, which I call Sinocentric originism. The development of Chinese online pseudohistory is summarized in this article into five mechanisms: mythic totalization, philological mythopoiesis, archival alibi, ontological escalation, and the final normative closure. Comparing this corpus with the Ruhnama, QAnon, and Ynglism, I identify a form of total history produced without a central author or institution. Drawing on Gu Jiegang's theory of layered antiquity, I argue that these alleged origins are better understood as modern projections onto the past.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yanpeng Zhang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: