Examines recent developments in organization theory and considers their relevance for personnel practitioners. Suggests that an important contribution of these developments has been their challenge to the authority of established analyses in which there has been a tendency to overlook the constructed and fundamentally political nature of this knowledge. More specifically, provides a critical appraisal of the work of Stewart Clegg and, in particular, his Modern Organizations . Argues that the commitment in earlier work to extend and enrich the analysis of organizations has been displaced and diluted in his examination of “things postmodern”. In Modern Organizations , the critical thrust of earlier books is blunted by an objectivism which dilutes or suspends their concerns in favour of an attempt to provide seemingly more refined or accurate maps of organizational reality. It is difficult to see how this move is compatible with a commitment to develop theory which by challenging established ways of thinking about organizing, may contribute to the fostering of less divisive and destructive organizational practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hugh Willmott (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: