Key result
The discovery of Nav1.7 inhibitors GDC-0276 and GDC-0310 yielded compounds with improved metabolic stability, Nav selectivity, and pharmacokinetic profiles that have completed Phase 1 trials.
Why the study?
Despite extensive investigation of Nav1.7 as a target for pain with a strong human genetic link, identifying efficacious, selective, and safe inhibitors remains challenging.
The discovery of GDC-0276 and GDC-0310 provides novel, selective Nav1.7 inhibitors with improved pharmacokinetic profiles for the treatment of pain.
Supports Nav1.7 inhibitor advancement to Phase 1; leaves open clinical efficacy for pain.
Na v 1.7 is an extensively investigated target for pain with a strong genetic link in humans, yet in spite of this effort, it remains challenging to identify efficacious, selective, and safe inhibitors. Here, we disclose the discovery and preclinical profile of GDC-0276 ( 1 ) and GDC-0310 ( 2 ), selective Na v 1.7 inhibitors that have completed Phase 1 trials. Our initial search focused on close-in analogues to early compound 3 . This resulted in the discovery of GDC-0276 ( 1 ), which possessed improved metabolic stability and an acceptable overall pharmacokinetics profile. To further derisk the predicted human pharmacokinetics and enable QD dosing, additional optimization of the scaffold was conducted, resulting in the discovery of a novel series of N-benzyl piperidine Na v 1.7 inhibitors. Improvement of the metabolic stability by blocking the labile benzylic position led to the discovery of GDC-0310 ( 2 ), which possesses improved Na v selectivity and pharmacokinetic profile over 1 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Safina et al. (2021) studied Pain. GDC-0276 and GDC-0310 was evaluated on Preclinical profile, metabolic stability, and pharmacokinetics. The discovery of Nav1.7 inhibitors GDC-0276 and GDC-0310 yielded compounds with improved metabolic stability, Nav selectivity, and pharmacokinetic profiles that have completed Phase 1 trials.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: