A comparison of velocity(-derived) quantities is made in the slipstream of a turboprop equipped transport aircraft between phase-locked experimental Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) data and unsteady Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (uRANS) calculations. Velocity results indicate a high level of agreement between the numerical and experimental . In addition to velocity vector data, also derived quantities, such as vorticity, allow a verification and validation of the modeling in CFD. Although a good agreement is , future needs for the comparison and validation of computational (CFD) and experimental (PIV) data are highlighted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roosenboom et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: