Why the study?
Evidence identifies Lp(a) as an independent CVD risk factor, creating a need for clinical recommendations on its measurement and management strategies.
This consensus statement provides practical recommendations for identifying and managing patients with elevated Lipoprotein(a) to reduce cardiovascular risk.
May enhance CVD risk stratification; confirms Lp(a) independence yet leaves measurement thresholds and therapies open.
Lipoprotein(a), Lp(a), is a modified atherogenic low-density lipoprotein particle that contains apolipoprotein(a). Its levels are highly heritable and variable in the population. This consensus statement by HEART UK is based on the evidence that Lp(a) is an independent cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor, provides recommendations for its measurement in clinical practice and reviews current and emerging therapeutic strategies to reduce CVD risk. Ten statements summarise the most salient points for practitioners and patients with high Lp(a). HEART UK recommends that Lp(a) is measured in adults as follows: 1) those with a personal or family history of premature atherosclerotic CVD; 2) those with first-degree relatives who have Lp(a) levels >200 nmol/l; 3) patients with familial hypercholesterolemia; 4) patients with calcific aortic valve stenosis and 5) those with borderline (but <15%) 10-year risk of a cardiovascular event. The management of patients with raised Lp(a) levels should include: 1) reducing overall atherosclerotic risk; 2) controlling dyslipidemia with a desirable non-HDL-cholesterol level of <100 mg/dl (2.5 mmol/l) and 3) consideration of lipoprotein apheresis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cegla et al. (2019) conducted a review in High Lipoprotein(a) and cardiovascular disease risk. Lipoprotein(a) measurement and management was evaluated. HEART UK consensus statement recommends measuring Lipoprotein(a) in adults with high cardiovascular risk and managing raised levels by reducing overall atherosclerotic risk and controlling dyslipidemia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: