Key result
Functional magnetic stimulation improves upper-limb recovery vs LF-rTMS, with ~3.3-fold higher wrist and finger extension.
RCT (n=40)
Single-blind
randomly assigned
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To clarify the efficacy of functional magnetic stimulation (FMS) in improving hemiplegic upper extremity function in patients with sub-acute stroke. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 40 sub-acute stroke patients with hemiplegia were recruited from inpatient wards in the Department of Rehabilitation and randomly assigned to two groups. In the FMS group, magnetic stimulation was applied to extensor muscle groups of the affected upper extremity. In the low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) group, stimulation was applied to the contralesional primary motor cortex. All patients received occupational therapy. Hand and upper extremity motor function was evaluated using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper extremity (FMA-UE), and the Barthel Index (BI) evaluated daily living abilities. RESULTS: The FMA-UE and BI scores were significantly increased in both groups following stimulation. Furthermore, a significant between-group difference was observed in both FMA-UE and BI scores after 2 weeks of therapy. In the FMS group, 6 of 19 patients regained wrist and finger extension abilities, but only 2 patients regained equivalent motor skills in the LF-rTMS group. CONCLUSIONS: FMS improves paretic upper extremity function and leads to better recovery of motor activity than LF-rTMS. FMS may be a novel modality to improve motor function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Sub-acute stroke with hemiplegia (n=40). Functional magnetic stimulation (FMS) vs. Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) was evaluated on Hand and upper extremity motor function (FMA-UE), daily living abilities (BI), and regaining wrist and finger extension abilities. Functional magnetic stimulation significantly improved upper extremity motor function and daily living abilities compared to LF-rTMS, with 31.6% vs 9.5% of patients regaining wrist/finger extension.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: