Key result
Antithrombin-independent thrombin inhibitors increased peak thrombin generation up to 2.2-fold in human plasma, whereas direct factor Xa inhibitors suppressed it.
Why the study?
Do antithrombin-independent thrombin inhibitors enhance thrombin generation in human plasma compared to direct factor Xa inhibitors?
Do antithrombin-independent thrombin inhibitors enhance thrombin generation in human plasma compared to direct factor Xa inhibitors?
Antithrombin-independent thrombin inhibitors, unlike direct factor Xa inhibitors, can paradoxically enhance thrombin generation in vitro by inhibiting the protein C activation pathway.
May increase thrombotic risk at select DTI doses; leaves open human relevance and mechanisms.
There is increasing concern that some anticoagulants can paradoxically increase thrombogenesis under certain circumstances. Previously, we demonstrated that at certain doses a direct thrombin inhibitor, melagatran, worsens the coagulation status induced by tissue factor (TF) injection in a rat model. We utilised an in vitro thrombin generation (TG) assay to determine if direct thrombin inhibitors could enhance TG in human plasma, and whether inhibition of the negative-feedback system [thrombin-thrombomodulin (TM)-protein C] contributed to the TG enhancement. TG in human plasma was assayed by means of the calibrated automated thrombography. In this assay, direct factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors such as edoxaban and antithrombin (AT)-dependent anticoagulants such as heparin did not increase, but simply suppressed TG. AT-independent thrombin inhibitors (melagatran, lepirudin, and active site blocked thrombin (IIai)) increased peak levels of TG (2.0, 1.6, and 2.2-fold, respectively) in the presence of 12 nM recombinant human soluble TM (rhsTM). Melagatran and lepirudin at higher concentrations began to suppress TG. In the absence of rhsTM, the enhancement of peak TG by melagatran decreased to 1.2-fold. Furthermore, in protein C-deficient plasma, AT-independent thrombin inhibitors failed to enhance TG. In addition, a human protein C neutralising antibody increased the peak height of TG in the presence of rhsTM. These results suggest that AT-independent thrombin inhibitors may activate thrombogenesis by suppression of the thrombin-induced negative-feedback system through inhibition of protein C activation. In contrast, direct FXa inhibitors are more useful than AT-independent thrombin inhibitors in terms of lower possibility of activation of the coagulation pathway.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sugiyama et al. (2011) studied this question. Antithrombin-independent thrombin inhibitors vs. Direct factor Xa inhibitors was evaluated on Peak levels of thrombin generation. Antithrombin-independent thrombin inhibitors increased peak thrombin generation up to 2.2-fold in human plasma, whereas direct factor Xa inhibitors suppressed it.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: