Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Adaptive Fuzzy C-Means with Logit Boost Distributed Clustering (AFC-LBDC) technique is introduced to enhance cancer detection promptly. The various conventional techniques often struggle to improve cancer detection due to their high complexity effectively. In contrast, the AFC-LBDC technique groups similar protein sequences to get better accuracy in cancer detection. Initially, a large protein dataset is divided into ‘C’ number of local clusters using an adaptive Fuzzy C-Means distributed clustering approach. For any protein sequences that are not assigned to a group, the Bayesian probability is computed to find the higher chance of the protein sequence becoming a member of a specific cluster. The Logit Boost technique is applied to improve the clustering performance further, which combines the number of local clusters to make a global cluster. The proposed AFC-LBDC method demonstrates high accuracy rates of 96%, 88%, and 86% for the P53, BRCA2, and HRAS cancer datasets, respectively. Comparative evaluation reveals that AFC-LBDC reduces cancer detection time by up to 31% compared to existing methods, achieving a 20% and 31% reduction over the RaNC and IDMPhyChm-Ens methods for the P53 dataset, 19% and 31% for BRCA2, and 22% and 32% for HRAS. Likewise, the proposed method significantly lowers the false positive rate, with reductions of 27% and 39% for P53, 28% and 36% for BRCA2, and 23% and 31% for HRAS, compared to RaNC and IDMPhyChm-Ens, respectively. In addition, AFC-LBDC minimises space complexity by up to 44%, with 27% and 39% reductions for P53, 24% and 42% for BRCA2, and 22% and 44% for HRAS datasets. These results collectively indicate the superior performance and efficiency of AFC-LBDC in cancer gene detection. The global clustering result improves the cancer detection accuracy and minimises the false positive rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thenmozhi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: