Key result
Captopril did not significantly improve simple walking test distance compared to placebo in older heart failure patients (123m for once-daily vs 75m for placebo; P>0.05).
Why the study?
Does captopril improve functional, physiological, and biochemical outcomes in aged heart failure patients?
RCT (n=20)
Double-blind
crossover
Does captopril improve functional, physiological, and biochemical outcomes in aged heart failure patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 123% vs 75%
p-value: p=>0.05
In elderly heart failure patients, captopril provided modest functional benefits that did not reach statistical significance, though it significantly reduced plasma ANF levels, with once-daily dosing appearing potentially more optimal than twice-daily.
Does not support captopril for walking distance in older HF; challenges prior assumptions of benefit.
Captopril was evaluated as an adjuvant to diuretic and digoxin therapy in heart failure in old age, using walking ability, minute ventilation and oxygen consumption and plasma atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) concentration as measures of outcome. 2. Twenty patients, mean (s.d.) age 81 (6) years, entered a double-blind, randomised, crossover study of three treatments, a twice daily regimen of captopril (AA), at a dosage established by titration against serum angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) activity, the same dosage in the morning with placebo at night (AP), and twice daily placebo (PP). Each treatment lasted 3 weeks. A 2 week run-in period on triple therapy, with AA captopril, was used to assess stability and compliance. Seventeen completed all treatments: three completed two. 3. Any benefit of captopril was modest and there was deterioration in gait on the titrated dosage 3 months afterwards (P = 0.04). Efficacy in the old may be greatest when the titrated dose (25 or 50 mg) is given once daily: the multiple daily doses recommended may be unnecessarily demanding. 4. Walking performance was measured by gait analysis (GA) at free walking speed and by a simple walking test (SWT), in which patients stopped at the first relevant symptom. There was a consistent tendency for four measures of performance (GA: speed, stride length and double support time; SWT distance) to be best on the AP treatment, next best on AA, and worst on PP but for the fifth, SWT speed, AP and AA were similar. The trend appeared most marked for SWT distance, mean (s.e. mean) values for AP, AA and PP being 123 (15), 94 (16) and 75 (16) m, respectively. However, the treatment effect did not reach statistical significance at the 0.05 level. 5. There was no significant difference between treatments in minute ventilation, minute oxygen consumption, or their ratio, either at rest or on exercise. 6. Resting ANF concentrations were nearly four times higher (P = 0.0001) in the patients than those, mean (s.e. mean) 66 (5) pmol l-1, in eleven healthy volunteers of mean age 80 (6) years, and the increase on exercise, seen in the controls (P less than 0.01), was absent. In the patients the resting plasma ANF concentration was significantly affected by treatment (P = 0.03), being less on both AP, 245 (9), and AA, 214 (9) than on PP, 264 (10) pmol l-1 (P = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively). 7. Baseline serum ACE activity was induced on active treatment. The change in ACE activity at 3 h post an active dose was significantly greater on AP than AA (P = 0.005). The increased sensitivity to inhibition during once daily administration was reflected in mean arterial pressure. The pre-dose standing pressure was less on AP than on PP (P less than 0.05), and the change in postural fall (pre-dose minus 2 h post), was greater (P = 0.004), but AA and PP were similar in these respects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O'Neill et al. (1992) conducted an RCT in Heart failure (n=20). Captopril vs. Placebo (PP) was evaluated on Simple walking test (SWT) distance (p=>0.05). Captopril did not significantly improve simple walking test distance compared to placebo in older heart failure patients (123m for once-daily vs 75m for placebo; P>0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: