Cells from Dictyostelium discoideum carry chemotactic cAMP receptors on their surface. Kinetic studies have revealed the existence of two slowly dissociating, high affinity receptor forms (SS and S) and one or more fast dissociating, low affinity forms (F) (Van Haastert, P.J.M., and De Wit, R.J.W. (1984) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 13321-13328). We have studied the interaction of these different cAMP-receptor types with a detergent-insoluble membrane residue. Isolated D. discoideum membranes were extracted with the detergent 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propane-sulfonate (CHAPS), which was previously shown to be the only detergent in the presence of which cAMP receptor binding is completely preserved (Janssens, P. M. W., and Van Driel, R. (1986) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 885, 91-101). The protein composition of the CHAPS-insoluble membrane residue appeared to be similar to that of the Triton X-100-insoluble membrane skeleton. Cyclic AMP binding studies revealed a specific association of the slowly dissociating cAMP receptors (SS and S forms) with this CHAPS-insoluble residue. All fast dissociating (F type) receptors were solubilized by CHAPS. GTP induced a transition of 75% of the SS and S receptors to faster dissociating forms. This transition was accompanied by the release of an equal number of receptors from the residue. These effects of GTP required that the cAMP receptor was occupied, and were completely reversible. After removal of the guanine nucleotide SS and S type receptors reappeared, bound to the residue, with a t1/2 of 5-10 min at 0 degrees C. We conclude that a detergent-insoluble membrane residue is involved in signal transduction via the chemotactic cAMP receptor. Both receptor occupation and a guanine nucleotide binding protein control receptor-residue interaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ludérus et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: