The long-time integration of Hamiltonian differential equations requires special numerical methods. Symplectic integrators are an excellent choice, but there are situations (e.g., multistep schemes or energy-preserving methods), where symplecticity is not possible. It is then of interest to study whether the methods are conjugate symplectic and thus have the same long-time behaviour as symplectic methods. This question is addressed in this work for the class of B-series integrators. Algebraic criteria for conjugate symplecticity up to a certain order are presented in terms of the coefficients of the B-series. The effect of simplifying assumptions is investigated. These criteria are then applied to characterize the conjugate symplecticity of implicit Runge–Kutta methods (Lobatto IIIA and Lobatto IIIB) and of energy-preserving collocation methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hairer et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: