Key result
Biologic DMARDs did not significantly increase the risk of venous thromboembolism compared to conventional DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.79-1.55).
Why the study?
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis have an increased risk of VTE, and biologic use in these patients may be associated with elevated VTE risk.
Does the use of biologic DMARDs increase the risk of venous thromboembolism compared to conventional DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?
Cohort (n=21,186)
Yes
Does the use of biologic DMARDs increase the risk of venous thromboembolism compared to conventional DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis?
In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, the use of biologic DMARDs was not associated with a significantly increased risk of venous thromboembolism compared to conventional DMARDs.
Adds reassuring VTE safety data for biologic DMARDs in RA; observational design leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
In the United States, 100,000-300,000 patients die from venous thromboembolism (VTE) each year, with more than 500,000 people related hospitalizations. While in Europe, 500,000 people die from VTE each year. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis are at increased risk of VTE. The use of biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis may be associated with an increased risk of VTE. We identified all patients who had been newly approved for Catastrophic Illness Card of rheumatoid arthritis extracted the claims data from the National Health Insurance research database and Registry for Catastrophic Illness Patient Database from 2003 to 2016. VTE was defined as the presence of inpatient VTE diagnostic codes (including DVT or PE) according to the discharge diagnosis protocol. An analysis of VTE variables indicated that the incidence of VTE in the biologic group (14.33/10,000 person-years) was higher than that in the conventional drug group (12.61/10,000 person-years). As assessed by the Cox proportional hazards model, the relative HR for VTE in the biologic group (HR: 1.11; 95% CI 0.79-1.55) versus that in the conventional drug group did not reach a significant difference. In conclusion, this study found no significant differences in risk were observed between the use of conventional DMARDs and biologics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Rheumatoid arthritis (n=21,186). Biologic DMARDs vs. Conventional DMARDs was evaluated on Venous thromboembolism (VTE) (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.79-1.55, p=0.546). Biologic DMARDs did not significantly increase the risk of venous thromboembolism compared to conventional DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.79-1.55).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: