Key result
Direct oral anticoagulants are recommended as first-line therapy for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism, a condition that affects up to 20% of patients with cancer.
Why the study?
Patients with cancer have unique challenges and comorbidities that complicate anticoagulation, and evidence is limited, absent, or conflicting for certain clinical situations.
What are the best practice suggestions for managing cancer-associated thrombosis in challenging clinical situations with limited evidence?
What are the best practice suggestions for managing cancer-associated thrombosis in challenging clinical situations with limited evidence?
This review provides expert guidance on managing cancer-associated thrombosis in challenging scenarios where high-quality evidence is lacking.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Guides DOAC selection in cancer-associated VTE; leaves open optimal duration and cancer-specific efficacy for prospective validation.
Malignancy is a significant risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). It is estimated that up to 20% of patients with cancer may develop VTE at some time in their cancer journey. Cancer-associated VTE can lead to hospitalizations, morbidity, delayed cancer treatment, and mortality. The optimal prevention and management of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is of utmost importance. Direct oral anticoagulants have been recommended as first-line therapy for VTE treatment in the general population and their efficacy has recently been demonstrated in the cancer population, leading to increased use. However, patients with cancer have unique challenges and comorbidities that can lead to increased risks and concerns with anticoagulation. Herein we will discuss commonly encountered challenges in patients with CAT, review available literature, and provide practice suggestions. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This article aims to specifically address cancer-associated thrombosis issues for which there is limited or absent evidence to guide best practice, for circumstances that pose unique challenges for clinicians, and for directions when the literature is conflicting. It reviews pertinent data for each selected topic and provides guidance for patient management based on the best available evidence and experiences from the panel.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2020) conducted a review in Cancer-associated thrombosis. Direct oral anticoagulants was evaluated. Direct oral anticoagulants are recommended as first-line therapy for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism, a condition that affects up to 20% of patients with cancer.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: