Why the study?
Does transoesophageal echocardiography detect more myocardial ischaemia than 12-lead ECG in patients in the early phase after coronary artery bypass surgery?
Does transoesophageal echocardiography detect more myocardial ischaemia than 12-lead ECG in patients in the early phase after coronary artery bypass surgery?
TEE is more sensitive than 12-lead ECG for detecting myocardial ischaemia in the early postoperative period following CABG.
TEE may detect more ischaemia than ECG post-CABG; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
The incidence of myocardial ischaemia, as diagnosed by transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) versus ECG, and the relationship between ischaemic events and haemodynamic parameters were studied in 30 patients in the early phase after coronary artery bypass grafting. Information comprising invasive haemodynamics, TEE measurements, and 12-lead ECG was obtained on arrival of the patient in the intensive care unit (ICU), and then hourly in the ICU for 5 h. In the ICU, TEE signs of ischaemia were found in 14 patients and ECG signs of ischaemia in six patients. The ischaemic events were not related to levels of blood pressure or heart rate. Three patients showed signs of myocardial infarction postoperatively. All three of these patients showed both TEE and ECG signs of ischaemia in the ICU. It was concluded that TEE reveals more ischaemic events than ECG in the early postoperative period and that these ischaemic events do not correlate with the haemodynamic indices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ÖOwall et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: