Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The small column size (0.3 mm i.d. x 15 cm) used in microscale HPLC contains only a small fraction (<1%) of the chromatographic packing material of a typical analytical HPLC column. Consequently, chromatographic stationary phases that are prohibitively expensive in conventional HPLC, owing either to synthetic complexity or costly starting materials, may become commercially viable in the microscale format. To illustrate this point, a previously described, synthetically complex, crown ether chiral stationary phase was prepared and evaluated in the microscale format, showing excellent separation of the enantiomers of underivatized amine analytes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Welch et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: