Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Luminescence and excited-state electron-transfer reactions of (dppe)Pt{S 2 C 2 (2-pyridine)(H)} and (dppe)Pt{S 2 C 2 (4-pyridine)(H)} (dppe = diphenyldiphosphinoethane) are enabled by protonation of the appended pyridine, thus serving as a novel means of electronic switching. The neutral complexes have low-lying d-to-d transitions that lead to rapid decay of excited states by nonradiative processes. However, upon protonation, a 1,2-enedithiolate-to-heterocycle π* intraligand charge-transfer transition (ILCT) becomes lower in energy than the d-to-d transition, thus giving rise to emissive 1 ILCT* and 3 ILCT* excited states for [(dppe)Pt{S 2 C 2 (2-pyridinium)(H)}][BF 4 ] and [(dppe)Pt{S 2 C 2 (4-pyridinium)(H)}][BF 4 ]. The assignment of these excited states was based on their energies and lifetimes (τ) which range from τ = 3 to 4 ns for the singlet and from τ = 2000 to 7500 ns for the triplet, respectively. Emission quantum yields (φ) increase with solvent polarity and range from φ = 0.0006 to 0.003 for the singlet and from φ = 0.001 to 0.03 for the triplet. The electron acceptors p -dinitrobenzene and tetracyanoquinodimethane quench the 3 ILCT* with k q values of 4 × 10 9 and 9 × 10 9 M - 1 s - 1, respectively. The k q values are nearly identical for the 2- and 4-pyridinium complexes, reflecting the similarity in the thermodynamic driving forces for electron transfer from these complexes. The ability to employ a simple and reversible ground-state reaction (ligand protonation) to control access to reactive excited states should prove useful in numerous applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kaiwar et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: