Key result
A dynamic patient prioritisation policy using AHP outperformed FCFS and static prioritisation in preventing health deterioration and reducing waiting time and lost patients in a simulation model.
Why the study?
Patient prioritisation in elective surgery is a critical multi-criteria decision-making issue, where elective patients should be ranked based on various evolving health conditions and criteria over time.
Does a dynamic prioritisation policy using AHP improve waiting list outcomes compared to FCFS and static prioritisation in elective surgery patients?
Does a dynamic prioritisation policy using AHP improve waiting list outcomes compared to FCFS and static prioritisation in elective surgery patients?
A dynamic prioritisation policy using AHP and discrete-event simulation improves elective surgery waiting list management by reducing health deterioration and patient loss.
Supports simulation-informed trials of AHP prioritization to reduce deterioration; leaves open clinical effectiveness.
Patient prioritisation in elective surgery is a critical multi-criteria decision-making issue. Elective patients should be ranked on the waiting list based on various criteria related to their health conditions and their evolution over time. This study suggests a dynamic prioritisation where elective patients are ranked considering their evolving health conditions, waiting time, and patient loss, i.e., the likelihood of patients abandoning the waiting list. We proposed deploying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to weigh prioritisation criteria. The AHP-derived weights are integrated into a discrete-event simulation model, which periodically ranks patients considering their health status, waiting time, and patient loss. The proposed dynamic prioritisation is compared with the first-come, first-served (FCFS) policy and the static prioritisation, which ranks patients according to their initial priority. Results showed that dynamic prioritisation outperforms the FCFS and static prioritisation policies in preventing health deterioration, reducing weighted waiting time, and reducing the ratio of lost patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frichi et al. (2023) studied Elective surgery. AHP-based dynamic patient prioritisation policy vs. First-come, first-served (FCFS) policy and static prioritisation was evaluated on Health deterioration, weighted waiting time, and ratio of lost patients. A dynamic patient prioritisation policy using AHP outperformed FCFS and static prioritisation in preventing health deterioration and reducing waiting time and lost patients in a simulation model.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: