Accessible summary Decision making by nurses on seclusion of severely disturbed and aggressive patients is a complex process; the relative importance of patient, professional and facility factors is unclear. In a vignette study, psychiatric nurses were asked to indicate to what extent they would or would not decide to seclude an imaginary patient. The (im)possibility to communicate with the patient, as well as factors concerning the availability and cooperation of the staff, proved to be at least as important as ‘pure’ patient characteristics as diagnosis, seclusion history and severity and target of threat. High team reflexivity, i.e. the extent to which team members reflect upon and communicate about the team's objectives, strategies and processes, seems to have a preventive effect on seclusion. Abstract While many characteristics of patients, professionals and facilities with relevance to seclusion rates have been investigated, their relative importance is unclear. Virtually no attention has been paid to team processes and reflexivity in relation to decision making on seclusion. The aim of this paper is to estimate the effects of these factors on nurse decision making on seclusion. Sixty Dutch psychiatric nurses of four closed wards reported team reflexivity and their tendency to seclude a theoretical patient. Approachability (whether there was a good or hardly any possibility to communicate with the patient), staffing level and confidence within the team had the greatest impact on the decision to seclude. Intra class correlation was 0.30. There was a large interaction effect of reflexivity with team 4, and team reflexivity was highly correlated with team tendency to avoid seclusion. In nurses' decision on seclusion, the effects of ‘pure’ patient characteristics are small as compared with the effects of interpersonal and contextual factors, and nurses vary widely in their judgement. Team reflexivity is related to the tendency to prevent seclusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boumans et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: