Based on (2)H/(1)H ratio measurements of commercial synthetic and "natural" references, the recently developed on-line gas chromatography pyrolysis isotope ratio mass spectrometry (HRGC-P-IRMS) technique was used to determine the delta(2)H(SMOW) values of the flavor compounds decanal, linalool, and linalyl acetate, as well as those of E-2-hexenal and E-2-hexenol in foods and essential oils. In preceding model studies, the influence of sample preparation steps (simultaneous distillation extraction, SDE; solvent extraction, SE; liquid liquid extraction, LLE) on the delta(2)H values was found to be negligible. For decanal, the typical (2)H abundance, with higher content of (2)H for synthetic material (delta(2)H(SMOW) from -90 to -156 per thousand) and lower (2)H content for natural references (delta(2)H(SMOW) from -138 to -262 per thousand) was observed. Although the delta(2)H data recorded for linalool did not allow one to distinguish between synthetic (delta(2)H(SMOW) from -207 to -301 per thousand) and natural (delta(2)H(SMOW) from -234 to -333 per thousand) materials, the situation was somewhat more encouraging for linalyl acetate; delta(2)H(SMOW) values from -199 to -239 per thousand and from -213 to -333 per thousand were found for synthetic and natural samples, respectively. E-2-Hexenal and E-2-hexenol showed clear-cut origin-dependent differences in their (2)H/(1)H ratios; that is, delta(2)H(SMOW) values from -14 to -109 per thousand and from -263 to -415 per thousand as well as from -41 to -131 per thousand and from -238 to -348 per thousand were recorded for products from synthetic and natural origins, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hör et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: