Using suitable approximations, the theory developed in a previous paper (Part I) forms the basis for the digital computer calculations presented in this paper (Part II). These calculations predict 1) the stimulated emission time delay for any value of the injection current amplitude and heat-sink temperature, 2) the temperature and current regions whereQswitching is possible, and 3) the large differences in delay andQ-switching behavior caused by different impurity profiles across the junction due to variations in fabrication. Computer-generated theoretical curves are in good agreement with both the previously known experimental data and the results, to be presented, of new experiments suggested by the theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ripper et al. (1969) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: