This research is on the structural, optical, and electrical properties of SnO2 and ZnO thin films, which are increasingly used in many electronic devices, including gas sensors, light-emitting diodes, and solar cells. For the various applications, it is essential to accurately determine the band gap energy, as it controls the optical and electrical behavior of the material. However, there is no single method for its determination; rather, different approximations depend on the crystalline quality and the doping level because these modify the energy band structure of the semiconductor. With the aim of analyzing the various approaches, SnO2 and ZnO films were prepared by sputtering on unheated glass substrates and subsequently annealed in N2 at various temperatures between 250 °C and 450 °C. These samples showed different crystallite sizes, absorption coefficients, and free carrier concentrations depending on the material and the annealing temperature. Analysis of the results shows that the expression developed for amorphous materials underestimates the band gap value, and the so-called unified method tends to overestimate it, while the equations for perfect or heavily doped crystals give band gap energies more consistent with the doping level, regardless of the crystalline quality of the films.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
C. Guillén (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: