High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Current decarbonization pressures are prompting efforts to reimagine the future of the hard-to-abate cement sector. To date, fuel switching has arisen as the most readily operational strategy, and its application in the cement sector is expected in the short to midterm. However, around two-thirds of the cement CO 2 emissions come from the calcination of limestone. The implementation of CO 2 capture utilization and/or storage will be crucial to support a reliable net-zero carbon future by 2050–2070. CCS is considered as the most carbon-neutral technology in the cement decarbonization roadmap, while CO 2 recycling (CCU) has arisen as a suitable strategy for those locations where there is an industrial symbiosis between the cement market and CO 2 -based chemical markets (e.g., methanol, formic acid, etc.). Despite that the CCU strategy cannot be carbon-neutral by itself, it could be a powerful option in combination with CCS. To date, most CO 2 recycling technologies are still emerging, and their development has to be boosted in the next decades. In this study, a prospective environmental analysis has been conducted through life cycle thinking to explore the benefits of cement long-term decarbonization by implementing a carbon recycling plant (CRP) based on the emerging electrochemical reduction (ER) of CO 2 to produce methanol (MeOH). The study aims to demonstrate the synergic decarbonization and defossilization for both cement and MeOH markets, respectively. Cell energy efficiency and MeOH concentration have been identified as the key performance parameters that should be around 60% and 40% wt, respectively, to ensure a future sustainable implementation of ER to the MeOH technology. A CRP powered by low-carbon renewable electricity (<0.02 kg CO 2eq /kW h) and with a low-fossil depletion (FD) impact (<0.01 kg oil eq /kW h) could lead to an integrated cement and MeOH production with sharp reductions in the carbon footprint (∼75%) and FD (∼66%) of the integrated cement and MeOH production compared to the conventional fossil-based productions. The proposed CO 2 recycling scheme can contribute to accelerating the innovation of carbon capture and recycling technologies and their deployment in these hard-to-abate sectors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rumayor et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: