Aim of the study In light of international obligations and the pursuit of sustainable development, this article examines and identifies gaps in national legislation, while aiming to evaluate the degree of convergence with EU environmental and digital standards, and to formulate recommendations for harmonizing regulatory frameworks to support sustainable development. Material and methods An interdisciplinary methodology was applied, combining comparative legal analysis, systemic and historical-logical approaches, and case studies of key EU digital governance platforms. The analysis drew upon EU regulations, Ukrainian legislation, OECD and UNEP–FAO analytical frameworks, as well as scientific literature, to examine institutional alignment, technological infrastructure, and governance practices. Results and conclusions Findings reveal partial convergence between Ukraine’s regulatory system and EU requirements. Key deficiencies include fragmented legislation, limited interoperability of agricultural data systems, weak institutional coordination, and insufficient support for small and medium-sized farms. Comparative analysis indicates that the EU’s hybrid model, which integrates digital monitoring, environmental conditionality, and multi-level governance, provides structurally relevant lessons for Ukraine. The study identifies priority gaps in eco-scheme implementation, advisory systems, data governance, and cross-sectoral cooperation. Strengthening institutional capacity, establishing unified agri-environmental monitoring, enhancing data interoperability, and expanding support for SMEs are essential for effective alignment with EU agricultural and environmental policies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Getman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: