Virtual screening targeting the urokinase receptor (uPAR) led to (±)-3-(benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)-N-(benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-ylmethyl)-4-phenylbutan-1-amine 1 (IPR-1) and N-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1-(4-isopropylphenyl)-5-(piperidin-4-yl)-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide 3 (IPR-69). Synthesis of an analogue of 1, namely, 2 (IPR-9), and 3 led to breast MDA-MB-231 invasion, migration and adhesion assays with IC(50) near 30 μM. Both compounds blocked angiogenesis with IC(50) of 3 μM. Compounds 2 and 3 inhibited cell growth with IC(50) of 6 and 18 μM and induced apoptosis. Biochemical assays revealed leadlike properties for 3, but not 2. Compound 3 administered orally reached peak concentration of nearly 40 μM with a half-life of about 2 h. In NOD-SCID mice inoculated with breast TMD-231 cells in their mammary fat pads, compound 3 showed a 20% reduction in tumor volumes and less extensive metastasis was observed for the treated mice. The suitable pharmacokinetic properties of 3 and the encouraging preliminary results in metastasis make it an ideal starting point for next generation compounds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: