Key result
A 2-minute cryoablation application time produced similar ablation lesion surface area compared to a 4-minute application (167.8 vs 194.3 mm2, P=0.40) in a preclinical canine model.
Why the study?
Does a 2-minute cryoablation application time produce similar lesion sizes compared to a 4-minute application time in a canine model?
RCT (n=32)
Blinded
Stratified randomization
Does a 2-minute cryoablation application time produce similar lesion sizes compared to a 4-minute application time in a canine model?
A 2-minute cryoablation application time produces similar lesion sizes to the standard 4-minute application in a canine model, suggesting potential to reduce procedural times.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports investigation of shorter cryoablation times in humans; leaves open clinical efficacy and durability.
Focal Transcatheter Cryoablation Introduction The standard 4‐minute application time for transcatheter cryoablation was determined in the 1990s when the system employed less potent chlorofluorocarbon refrigerants. The current refrigerant, nitrous oxide, generates substantially colder temperatures, with a faster cooling rate. Methods and Results We conducted a preclinical study on 32 mongrel dogs with stratified randomization of right atrial, right ventricular, and left ventricular chambers to 2‐minute versus 4‐minute application times using 8‐mm electrode tip cryocatheters (Freezor Max, Medtronic CryoCath LP, Montreal, Canada). Animals were sacrificed one month after the procedure. Three‐dimensional morphometric analyses were conducted in a blinded fashion. A total of 193 identified ablation lesions were processed for histological analyses, 102 with 2‐minute applications and 91 with 4‐minute applications. Ablation lesion surface area (167.8 ± 21.6 mm 2 vs. 194.3 ± 22.6 mm 2 , P = 0.40), maximum depth (4.4 ± 0.2 mm vs. 4.5 ± 0.2 mm, P = 0.71), and volume (125.7 ± 69.5 mm 3 vs. 141.0 ± 83.5 mm 3 , P = 0.25) were similar between groups. Overall, 90.2% of ablation lesions in the right atrium were transmural, 45.6% in the right ventricle, and 2.4% in the left ventricle, with no differences between 2‐minute and 4‐minute application times (P = 0.55). Thrombus was detected on the endocardial surface of 0.0% and 3.3% of ablation lesions created with 2‐minute and 4‐minute application times, respectively (P = 0.10). Conclusion Single 2‐minute and 4‐minute application times result in catheter ablation lesions of similar size using the modern cryoablation system with nitrous oxide as a refrigerant. While these findings suggest the potential to reduce the standard 4‐minute application time, further studies are required to compare clinical efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bessière et al. (2017) reported an RCT. 2-minute cryoablation application vs. 4-minute cryoablation application was evaluated on Ablation lesion surface area (p=0.40). A 2-minute cryoablation application time produced similar ablation lesion surface area compared to a 4-minute application (167.8 vs 194.3 mm2, P=0.40) in a preclinical canine model.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: