Key result
The fractional fuzzy dispersion entropy (FFDispEn) algorithm combined with a support vector machine achieved a 97.5% accuracy in detecting muscle fatigue, outperforming traditional entropy measures.
Why the study?
Fuzzy dispersion entropy combines dispersion entropy and fuzzy entropy but suffers from insensitivity to dynamic changes.
Does the fractional fuzzy dispersion entropy (FFDispEn) algorithm improve the detection and classification of muscle fatigue from sEMG signals compared to SampEn and DispEn in healthy volunteers?
Observational (n=29)
No
Does the fractional fuzzy dispersion entropy (FFDispEn) algorithm improve the detection and classification of muscle fatigue from sEMG signals compared to SampEn and DispEn in healthy volunteers?
The proposed fractional fuzzy dispersion entropy (FFDispEn) algorithm provides a highly accurate and sensitive nonlinear dynamic indicator for sEMG signal processing and muscle fatigue detection.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
FFDispEn-SVM may aid muscle fatigue detection; leaves open prospective clinical validation.
Recently, fuzzy dispersion entropy (DispEn) has attracted much attention as a new nonlinear dynamics method that combines the advantages of both DispEn and fuzzy entropy. However, it suffers from limitation of insensitivity to dynamic changes. To solve this limitation, we proposed fractional fuzzy dispersion entropy (FFDispEn) based on DispEn, a novel fuzzy membership function and fractional calculus. The fuzzy membership function was defined based on the Euclidean distance between the embedding vector and dispersion pattern. Simulated signals generated by the one-dimensional (1D) logistic map were used to test the sensitivity of the proposed method to dynamic changes. Moreover, 29 subjects were recruited for an upper limb muscle fatigue experiment, during which surface electromyography (sEMG) signals of the biceps brachii muscle were recorded. Both simulated signals and sEMG signals were processed using a sliding window approach. Sample entropy (SampEn), DispEn and FFDispEn were separately used to calculate the complexity of each frame. The sensitivity of different algorithms to the muscle fatigue process was analyzed using fitting parameters through linear fitting of the complexity of each frame signal. The results showed that for simulated signals, the larger the fractional order q, the higher the sensitivity to dynamic changes. Moreover, DispEn performed poorly in the sensitivity to dynamic changes compared with FFDispEn. As for muscle fatigue detection, the FFDispEn value showed a clear declining tendency with a mean slope of −1.658 × 10⁻³ as muscle fatigue progresses; additionally, it was more sensitive to muscle fatigue compared with SampEn (slope: −0.4156 × 10⁻³) and DispEn (slope: −0.1675 × 10⁻³). The highest accuracy of 97.5% was achieved with the FFDispEn and support vector machine (SVM). This study provided a new useful nonlinear dynamic indicator for sEMG signal processing and muscle fatigue analysis. The proposed method may be useful for physiological and biomedical signal analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Muscle fatigue (n=29). Fractional fuzzy dispersion entropy (FFDispEn) with SVM vs. Dispersion entropy (DispEn) and Sample entropy (SampEn) was evaluated on Accuracy of muscle fatigue detection. The fractional fuzzy dispersion entropy (FFDispEn) algorithm combined with a support vector machine achieved a 97.5% accuracy in detecting muscle fatigue, outperforming traditional entropy measures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: