Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming education, with the emergence of Agentic AI introducing new opportunities for adaptive, autonomous, and context-aware support. This perspective paper explores Agentic AI, a bridge connecting educational leadership, developmental supervision, reflective professional learning, educator readiness, and sustainable education. Drawing on Glickman's Developmental Supervision Model, Gibb's Reflective Cycle, and research on teacher workload and professional growth, the paper argues that Agentic AI can support differentiated supervision, continuous reflection, and personalized professional development while reducing administrative pressures. However, its successful implementation depends on supportive leadership, organizational readiness, and educators’ willingness to engage with innovation. From a perspective paper, Agentic AI is positioned not as a replacement for educators, but as a tool that has the potential to enhance human expertise and strengthen educational sustainability. By integrating technological innovation with human-centered educational practices, Agentic AI offers a pathway toward more adaptive, inclusive, and future-oriented educational systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: