Key result
Observing brain-heart interactions, such as heartbeat-evoked responses, helps detect residual consciousness and supports the involvement of visceral activity in the neurobiology of consciousness.
Why the study?
Recent evidence suggests visceral and brain-heart interactions help detect residual consciousness and play a causal role in emotions and consciousness, prompting a review of the theoretical and experimental landscape.
This review highlights the potential of brain-heart interactions, such as heartbeat-evoked responses, as biomarkers for detecting residual consciousness and understanding the neurobiology of cognition and emotions.
May aid consciousness assessment in unresponsive patients; leaves open visceral roles in neurobiology pending higher-level evidence.
Recent experimental evidence on patients with disorders of consciousness revealed that observing brain-heart interactions helps to detect residual consciousness, even in patients with absence of behavioral signs of consciousness. Those findings support hypotheses suggesting that visceral activity is involved in the neurobiology of consciousness, and sum to the existing evidence in healthy participants in which the neural responses to heartbeats reveal perceptual and self-consciousness. More evidence obtained through mathematical modeling of physiological dynamics revealed that emotion processing is prompted by an initial modulation from ascending vagal inputs to the brain, followed by sustained bidirectional brain-heart interactions. Those findings support long-lasting hypotheses on the causal role of bodily activity in emotions, feelings, and potentially consciousness. In this paper, the theoretical landscape on the potential role of heartbeats in cognition and consciousness is reviewed, as well as the experimental evidence supporting these hypotheses. I advocate for methodological developments on the estimation of brain-heart interactions to uncover the role of cardiac inputs in the origin, levels, and contents of consciousness. The ongoing evidence depicts interactions further than the cortical responses evoked by each heartbeat, suggesting the potential presence of non-linear, complex, and bidirectional communication between brain and heartbeat dynamics. Further developments on methodologies to analyze brain-heart interactions may contribute to a better understanding of the physiological dynamics involved in homeostatic-allostatic control, cognitive functions, and consciousness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diego Candia‐Rivera (2022) conducted a review in Disorders of consciousness. Brain-heart interactions was evaluated. Observing brain-heart interactions, such as heartbeat-evoked responses, helps detect residual consciousness and supports the involvement of visceral activity in the neurobiology of consciousness.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: