Key result
High advanced practice provider integration was associated with lower 30-day mortality (2.0% vs 2.4%; P<.01) and major complications (30.2% vs 34.1%) compared to low integration.
Why the study?
While advanced practice providers are increasingly integrated into care delivery models, little is known about their impact on outcomes in surgical and multispecialty group practice settings.
Does higher integration of advanced practice providers improve 30-day postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing major surgery?
Cohort (n=190,101)
Yes
Does higher integration of advanced practice providers improve 30-day postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing major surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 2% vs 2.4%
p-value: p=<.01
Integration of advanced practice providers into multispecialty group practices is associated with improved 30-day postoperative outcomes, including lower mortality, major complications, and readmissions after major surgery.
Hypothesis-generating for APP integration benefits in surgery; prospective trials needed before practice change.
Background. While advanced practice providers (APPs) are increasingly integrated into care delivery models, little is known about their impact in surgical settings. Given that many patients undergo surgery in multispecialty group practice settings, we examined the impact of APP integration into such practices on outcomes after major surgery. Methods. We used a 20% sample of national Medicare claims to identify 190 101 patients who underwent 1 of 4 major surgeries (coronary artery bypass graft [CABG], colectomy, major joint replacement, and cystectomy) at multispecialty group practices from 2010 through 2016. The level of APP integration was measured as the ratio of APPs to physicians within each practice. Rates of mortality, major complications, and readmission within 30 days of discharge after the index surgery were compared between patients treated in practices with low, medium, and high levels of APP integration using multivariable regression analysis. Results. Relative to patients treated in practices with low APP integration, those treated in practices with medium or high APP integration had significantly lower rates of mortality (2.4% [low integration] vs 1.9% [medium integration] vs 2.0% [high integration]; P < .01), major complications (34.1% [low] vs 31.2% [medium] vs 30.2% [high]; P < .01), and readmission (11.7% [low] vs 10.6% [medium] vs 10.1% [high]; P < .01). This relationship was consistent for virtually all outcomes when considering each surgery type individually. Conclusions. Integration of APPs into multispecialty group practices was associated with improved postoperative outcomes after major surgery. Future research should identify the mechanisms by which APPs improve outcomes to inform optimal utilization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lai et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Major surgery (CABG, colectomy, major joint replacement, cystectomy) (n=190,101). High advanced practice provider (APP) integration vs. Low APP integration was evaluated on Mortality within 30 days of discharge (p=<.01). High advanced practice provider integration was associated with lower 30-day mortality (2.0% vs 2.4%; P<.01) and major complications (30.2% vs 34.1%) compared to low integration.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: