OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the reasons for not taking up a fall or injury prevention strategy among older people who have sustained a fall and attended an emergency department. SUBJECTS: As part of another trial, we identified 60 people who attended the emergency department of a public hospital with a fall. MAIN MEASURES: Participants were interviewed to ascertain the reasons for not taking up a falls prevention strategy, their falls-related health state, and the likelihood of them undertaking a falls and injury prevention strategy. RESULTS: A total of 31 (52%) of the participants had considered falls prevention after their fall. There were high levels of reluctance to undertake a strategy with 43 (72%) reluctant to take exercise classes, 10 (59%) reluctant to cease psychotropic medications, 26 (43%) reluctant to have a home safety assessment and 17 (28%) reluctant to take osteoporotic medication. When asked specifically about taking up a strategy to prevent a worsening health state, 19 (63%) of participants would take up exercise, 17 (57%) a home safety assessment, 4 of the 17 (59%) already taking implicated medications would stop and 56 (93%) would begin osteoporotic medication. These decisions did not alter when the goal for treatment was to improve a much worse health state. In participants with a lower starting health state, home safety assessments were viewed more favourably. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant obstacles to the implementation of most falls prevention guidelines examined. Treatment for osteoporosis was more acceptable to participants than exercise classes, cessation of psychotropic medication, and having a home safety assessment. Osteoporosis treatment, which had the least resistance, also had the least impact on the participants' lifestyle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Whitehead et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: