Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The in vitro activity of monodesethylamodiaquine and amopyroquine was evaluated against chloroquine-susceptible and chloroquine-resistant African clones of Plasmodium falciparum. The chloroquine-resistant clone (50% inhibitory concentration [IC50] = 1,630 nM) was 26 and 3.7 times less susceptible to monodesethylamodiaquine and amopyroquine, respectively, than the chloroquine-susceptible clone (IC50 = 36.5 nM). Cross-resistance patterns of chloroquine, monodesethylamodiaquine, and amopyroquine were determined against 62 African isolates of P. falciparum obtained from imported cases of malaria in France, using an isotopic semimicro drug susceptibility test. Chloroquine-resistant isolates (n = 38) were significantly less susceptible to both monodesethylamodiaquine (IC50 = 74.8 nM) and amopyroquine (IC50 = 18.9 nM), as compared with the 24 chloroquine-susceptible isolates (IC50 = 28.2 nM and 16.1 nM, respectively). A significant positive correlation was found between chloroquine and monodesethylamodiaquine (r = 0.903) and between chloroquine and amopyroquine (r = 0.371), indicating in vitro cross-resistance among these drugs. These in vitro results suggest that the clinical response to amodiaquine and amopyroquine needs to be closely monitored in Africa.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Basco et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: