BACKGROUND: Preoperative prediction of the grade of soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) is important because of its effect on treatment planning. PURPOSE: To assess the value of radiomics features in distinguishing histological grades of STSs. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: In all, 113 patients with pathology-confirmed low-grade (grade I), intermediate-grade (grade II), or high-grade (grade III) soft tissue sarcoma were collected. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: WI with 4291 msec TR, 85 msec TE, 312 × 312 matrix. ASSESSMENT: Multiple machine-learning methods were trained to establish classification models for predicting STS grades. Eighty STS patients (18 low-grade [grade I]; 62 high-grade [grades II-III]) were enrolled in the primary set and we tested the model with a validation set with 33 patients (7 low-grade, 26 high-grade). STATISTICAL TESTS: test were applied for categorical variables between low-grade STS and high-grade STS groups. 2) For feature subset selection, either no subset selection or recursive feature elimination was performed. This technology was combined with random forest and support vector machine-learning methods. Finally, to overcome the disparity in the frequencies of the STS grades, each machine-learning model was trained i) without subsampling, ii) with the synthetic minority oversampling technique, and iii) with random oversampling examples, for a total of 12 combinations of machine-learning algorithms that were assessed, trained, and tested in the validation cohort. RESULTS: The best classification model for the prediction of STS grade was a combination of features selected by recursive feature elimination and random forest classification algorithms with a synthetic minority oversampling technique, which had an area under the curve of 0.9615 (95% confidence interval 0.8944-1.0) in the validation set. DATA CONCLUSION: Radiomics feature-based machine-learning methods are useful for distinguishing STS grades. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:791-797.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2019) studied this question.