Key result
Age of first exposure to amateur American Football before age 12 was not associated with worse later-life depressive symptoms (MD 0.51, p=0.682), anxiety, or cognitive difficulties.
Why the study?
Younger age of first exposure to American football is associated with later-life health problems in professional athletes, but studies in amateur athletes are less clear.
Does age of first exposure to American Football < 12 years increase adverse psychiatric, cognitive, neurobehavioral, or general health outcomes in former amateur players?
Cross-Sectional (n=107)
Does age of first exposure to American Football < 12 years increase adverse psychiatric, cognitive, neurobehavioral, or general health outcomes in former amateur players?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Age of first exposure to American Football before age 12 is not associated with worse later-life psychiatric or cognitive outcomes in amateur players, whereas the total number of lifetime concussions is a significant predictor of adverse outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Younger age of first exposure (AFE) to American Football (football) is associated with later-life health problems among former professional athletes in several studies; however, studies examining amateur (i.e., nonprofessional) athletes are less clear. OBJECTIVE: In a cohort of former amateur American Football players, this study assessed whether AFE to football was associated with: (1) psychiatric and neurobehavioral symptoms, (2) cognitive difficulties, (3) general health problems, (4) motor symptoms, and (5) functional status. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted using the ResearchMatch platform. The key independent variable was age of first exposure to football (AFE < 12 versus AFE ≥ 12). Main outcomes included depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9; PHQ-9), anxiety symptoms (Generalized Anxiety Disorders-7; GAD-7), cognitive difficulties (British Columbia Cognitive Complaints Inventory; BC-CCI), Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) score, and prevalence of other health problems. Multivariable regressions were assessed for associations between AFE and outcome variables. RESULTS: In total, 107 male participants with exposure to football (mean age: 60.6 ± 15.1 years) reported an average of 4.2 ± 2.7 years of exposure to football, with an average AFE of 11.7 ± 3.1 years. In multivariable analyses, AFE < 12 was not a significant predictor of PHQ-9 (unstandardized beta, B: 0.51, standard error, SE: 1.25, p = 0.682), GAD-7 (B: 0.09, SE: 0.95, p = 0.926), NSI (B: - 0.56, SE: 2.93, p = 0.850), or BC-CCI (B: - 0.65, SE: 0.77, p = 0.403). However, more prior concussions were associated with worse PHQ-9 (B: 0.44, SE: 0.10, p < 0.001), GAD-7 (B: 0.33, SE: 0.07, p < 0.001), NSI (B: 1.04, SE: 0.23, p < 0.001), and BC-CCI scores (B: 0.26, SE: 0.06, p < 0.001). AFE < 12 did not predict general health problems or independent functional status. CONCLUSIONS: AFE to football was not associated with adverse psychiatric, cognitive, neurobehavioral, or general health outcomes among young, former amateur American Football players. However, more lifetime concussions were associated with adverse cognitive and psychiatric health outcomes. Future studies should examine similar outcomes in older cohorts with more comorbidities to further minimize potential confounding between general health and lack of later-life symptoms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rigney et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in History of amateur American Football participation (n=107). Age of first exposure to American Football < 12 years vs. Age of first exposure to American Football ≥ 12 years was evaluated on Depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9; PHQ-9) in multivariable analysis (B: 0.51, 95% CI -1.97, 3.00, p=0.682). Age of first exposure to amateur American Football before age 12 was not associated with worse later-life depressive symptoms (MD 0.51, p=0.682), anxiety, or cognitive difficulties.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: