Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Much evidence demonstrates the antinociceptive effect of magnetic fields (MFs). However, the analgesic action mechanism of the electromagnetic field (EMF) is not exactly understood. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of 5‐HT 1 and 5‐HT 2 receptor agonists (serotonin HCl and 2,5‐dimethoxy‐4‐iodoamphetamine [DOI] hydrochloride) on EMF‐induced analgesia. In total, 66 adult male Wistar albino rats with an average body mass of 225 ± 13 g were used in this study. The animals were subjected to repeated exposures of alternating 50 Hz and 5 mT EMF for 2 h a day for 15 days. Prior to analgesia tests, serotonin HCl (5‐HT 1 agonist) 4 mg/kg, WAY 100635 (5‐HT 1 antagonist) 0.04 mg/kg, DOI hydrochloride (5‐HT 2 receptor agonist) 4 mg/kg, and SB 204741 (5‐HT 2 antagonist) 0.5 mg/kg doses were injected into rats. For statistical analysis of the data, analysis of variance was used and multiple comparisons were determined by Tukey’s test. Administration of serotonin HCl MF (5 mT)‐exposed rats produced a significant increase in percent maximal possible effect (% MPE) as compared with EMF group ( P < 0.05). On the contrary, injection of WAY 100635 to MF‐exposed rats produced a significant decrease in analgesic activity ( P < 0.05). Similarly, the administration of DOI hydrochloride significantly increased % MPE values as compared with the EMF group while SB 204741 reduced it ( P < 0.05). In conclusion, our results suggested that serotonin 5‐HT 1 and 5‐HT 2 receptors play an important role in EMF‐induced analgesia; however, further research studies are necessary to understand the mechanism. Bioelectromagnetics. 2019;40:319–330.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özdemir et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: