We have studied the fire behavior and the heat transfer in the in tumescent formulations polypropylene (PP)-ammonium polyphosphate (APP)/pentaerythritol (PER) and PP-Hostaflam AP750 (AP750). We have shown that the fire proofing properties (LOI, UL-94 and cone calorimeter) of PP was strongly improved using the commercial additive AP750 in comparison with the system APP/PER. This is explained by the protection of the intumescent coating developed from PP-AP750 which is still efficient at high temperature (450-550°C) and which is developed faster. The measurement of temperature profiles in the conditions of the cone calorimeter shows that the temperatures reached with PP- AP750 are lower than these obtained with PP-APP/PER. Moreover, the tempera ture of PP-AP750 always remains lower than the temperature of the beginning of the fast degradation rate of PP which implies that there is never a fast degrada tion of the polymeric matrix. Finally, the computation of the temperature of the degradation front ( T d ) allows to conclude that low T d and relatively high displace ment rate of the place of the degradation front is needed to increase the efficiency of intumescent systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morice et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: