The intumescent flame-retardant system of acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) copolymer/polyamide 6 (PA6)/styrene-maleic anhydride (SMA) alloys (ratio 80/20/6) with ammonium polyphosphate (APP) was evaluated by the limiting oxygen index (LOI) and UL-94 tests. Furthermore, the different effects of various synergistic charring agents on the flame retardancy of the ABS/PA6/SMA alloys were also investigated, including caged bicyclicphosphates (PEPA), thermoplastic phenolic resin (TPPFR), epoxy resin (E-44), and Zeolite 4A. The results indicate that PA6 can act as a very efficient carbonization agent and intumescent flame retardant for ABS/PA6/SMA alloys. When the content of APP was 25 wt%, the LOI value of the ABS/PA6/SMA/APP system was 29 and with a UL-94 test rating of V-1; when the content of APP was 35 wt%, the UL-94 test rating was V-0. The higher the molecular weight of PA6, the better the flame retardancy of the ABS/PA6/SMA/APP system. The ABS/PA6/SMA alloy shows a much better charring performance and flame retardancy when the mass ratio of APP/PEPA or APP/E-44 is 20/5, or APP/Zeolite 4A is 22/3. The expansion and dense carbon layer formed on the surface of the complex after burning were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: