This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Stomatal conductance ( g s ) models are widely used at a variety of scales to predict fluxes of mass and energy between vegetation and the atmosphere. Several g s models contain a parameter that specifies the minimum g s estimate ( g 0 ). Sensitivity analyses with a canopy flux model (MAESTRA) identified g 0 to have the greatest influence on transpiration estimates (seasonal mean of 40%). A spatial analysis revealed the influence of g 0 to vary (30–80%) with the amount of light absorbed by the foliage and to increase in importance as absorbed light decreased. The parameter g 0 is typically estimated by extrapolating the linear regression fit between observed g s and net photosynthesis ( A n ). However, our measurements demonstrate that the g s ‐ A n relationship may become nonlinear at low light levels and thus, extrapolating values from data collected over a range of light conditions resulted in an underestimation of g 0 in Malus domestica when compared to measured values (20.4 vs 49.7 mmol m −2 s −1 respectively). In addition, extrapolation resulted in negative g 0 values for three other woody species. We assert that g 0 can be measured directly with diffusion porometers (as g s when A n ≤ 0), reducing both the time required to characterize g 0 and the potential error from statistical approximation. Incorporating measured g 0 into MAESTRA significantly improved transpiration predictions versus extrapolated values (6% overestimation versus 45% underestimation respectively), demonstrating the benefit in g s models. Diffusion porometer measurements offer a viable means to quantify the g 0 parameter, circumventing errors associated with linear extrapolation of the g s ‐ A n relationship.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barnard et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: