Key result
Wearable in-ear pressure sensor achieves ~97% sensitivity for heart rate monitoring vs. reference ECG.
Why the study?
Does a novel in-ear piezoelectric sensor accurately measure heart rate compared to a reference ECG in healthy subjects?
Observational (n=58)
Does a novel in-ear piezoelectric sensor accurately measure heart rate compared to a reference ECG in healthy subjects?
A novel in-ear piezoelectric sensor provides highly accurate heart rate monitoring compared to standard ECG in healthy subjects.
Supports feasibility of in-ear HR sensing in healthy subjects; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
In this study, we developed a novel heart rate (HR) monitoring approach in which we measure the pressure variance of the surface of the ear canal. A scissor-shaped apparatus equipped with a piezoelectric film sensor and a hardware circuit module was designed for high wearability and to obtain stable measurement. In the proposed device, the film sensor converts in-ear pulse waves (EPW) into electrical current, and the circuit module enhances the EPW and suppresses noise. A real-time algorithm embedded in the circuit module performs morphological conversions to make the EPW more distinct and knowledge-based rules are used to detect EPW peaks. In a clinical experiment conducted using a reference electrocardiogram (ECG) device, EPW and ECG were concurrently recorded from 58 healthy subjects. The EPW intervals between successive peaks and their corresponding ECG intervals were then compared to each other. Promising results were obtained from the samples, specifically, a sensitivity of 97.25%, positive predictive value of 97.17%, and mean absolute difference of 0.62. Thus, highly accurate HR was obtained from in-ear pressure variance. Consequently, we believe that our proposed approach could be used to monitor vital signs and also utilized in diverse applications in the near future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Healthy (Heart Rate Monitoring) (n=58). Wearable in-ear pressure sensing device vs. Electrocardiogram (ECG) was evaluated on Sensitivity of peak-to-peak interval detection compared to ECG (Sensitivity 97.25%). A novel wearable in-ear pressure sensing device achieved 97.25% sensitivity and 97.18% positive predictive value for heart rate monitoring compared to a reference electrocardiogram.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: