different scales are used.In such a case the intraclass correlation coefficient computed for each method will indicate which is the more reliable, provided each method of measurement uses the same population, as in a dataset we recently examined.'In summary, we agree with Chinn when she says that "the intraclass correlation coefficient should be used only for comparative purposes.The within-subject standard deviation or 95 per cent range for change should be calculated as the absolute measure of repeatability."2
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Snowden et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: