Conjugated donor (D)–π–acceptor (A) copolymers, PBDT–TPD, PBDT–ttTPD, PBDTT–TPD, and PBDTT–ttTPD, based on a benzodithiophene (BDT) donor unit and thieno[3,4-c]pyrrole-4,6(5H)-dione (TPD) acceptor unit were designed and synthesized with different π bridges via Pd-catalyzed Stille-coupling. The π bridges between BDT and TPD were thiophene in PBDT–TPD and PBDTT–TPD, and 6-alkylthieno[3,2-b]thiophene in PBDT–ttTPD and PBDTT–ttTPD. The effects of the π bridges on the optical, electrochemical, and photovoltaic properties of the polymers were investigated, in addition to the film crystallinities and carrier mobilities. Copolymers with the 6-alkylthieno[3,2-b]thiophene π-bridge exhibited high crystallinity and hole mobility. Improved Jsc and FF were obtained to increase the overall power conversion efficiencies (PCE) in inverted single organic photovoltaic cells. A PCE of 6.81% was achieved from the inverted single device fabricated using the PBDTT–ttTPD:PC71BM blend film with 3 vol% 1,8-diiodooctane. A tandem photovoltaic device comprising the inverted PBDTT–ttTPD cell and a PTB7-based cell as the bottom and top cell components, respectively, showed a maximum PCE of 9.35% with a Voc of 1.58 V, a Jsc of 8.00 mA cm−2, and a FF of 74% under AM 1.5 G illumination at 100 mW cm−2. The obtained PCE of the bottom cell and FF of the tandem cell are, to the best of our knowledge, the highest reported to date for a tandem OPV device. This work demonstrates that PBDTT–ttTPD may be very promising for applications in tandem solar cells. Furthermore, 6-alkylthieno[3,2-b]thiophene π-bridge systems in medium bandgap polymers can improve the performance of tandem organic photovoltaic cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: