Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Deterioration of luminescence efficiency η of blue- and green-emitting ZnS-type phosphors, and red-emitting Eu3+-activated phosphors has been studied for high-voltage field emission displays (FEDs). In the blue-emitting ZnS:Ag,Al(Cl) phosphor (P22B and P55) case, the deterioration of η depends mainly on the crystallinity of the host crystal within the electron penetration depth d. It was found that a high-voltage FED tube having a longer lifetime was successfully prepared by using a crystalline-improved ZnS:Ag,Al phosphor. While, in the green-phosphor case, in order to optimize the donor–acceptor (D–A) pair density in ZnS:Cu,Al (P22G) for a suitable color gamut in FEDs, various ZnS:Cu,Al phosphors with low defect density were prepared by using a suitable firing method with a surface treatment like an improved ZnS:Ag,Al phosphor. It was found that the deterioration of improved ZnS:Cu,Al phosphors depends mainly on the D–A pair density in ZnS crystal. Furthermore, in the red-phosphor case, deterioration of Y2O2S:Eu3+ phosphor (P22R) for color-TV has been studied in comparison with a Y2O3:Eu3+(P56) for projection CRTs. It was found that a Y2O2S:Eu3+ phosphor shows a longer luminescence lifetime than a Y2O3:Eu3+ phosphor in high-voltage FEDs. These evidences suggest that the factors influencing the deterioration of luminescence efficiency in ZnS-type and Eu3+-activated phosphors for high-voltage FEDs are the crystallinity of the host crystal, the density of luminescence centers (i.e., susceptibility to the electron irradiation-induced lattice-defects), and the host material (i.e., susceptibility to surface chemical stability).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kazuo Kajiwara (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: