Key result
Visceral abdominal fat is linked to impaired FMD, but adds minimal value over subcutaneous fat.
Why the study?
Does visceral abdominal tissue reduce percentage of flow-mediated dilation in a community-based cohort?
Cross-Sectional (n=3,020)
Does visceral abdominal tissue reduce percentage of flow-mediated dilation in a community-based cohort?
While visceral adiposity is statistically associated with endothelial dysfunction independent of traditional risk factors, its incremental value over subcutaneous adiposity in explaining the variance of flow-mediated dilation is minimal.
Does not support routine visceral fat assessment for endothelial risk stratification; leaves open causal role in community cohorts.
Endothelial dysfunction may link obesity to cardiovascular disease (CVD). We tested the hypothesis that visceral abdominal tissue (VAT) as compared with subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) is more related to endothelium-dependent vasodilation. Among Framingham Offspring and Third Generation cohorts (n = 3,020, mean age 50 years, 47% women), we used multivariable linear regression adjusted for CVD and its risk factors to relate computed tomography (CT)-assessed VAT and SAT, BMI, and waist circumference (WC), with brachial artery measures. In multivariable-adjusted models, BMI, WC, VAT, and SAT were positively related to baseline artery diameter and baseline mean flow velocity (all P < 0.001), but not hyperemic mean flow velocity. In multivariable-adjusted models, BMI (P = 0.002), WC (P = 0.001), and VAT (P = 0.01), but not SAT (P = 0.24) were inversely associated with percentage of flow-mediated dilation (FMD%). However, there was little incremental increase in the proportion of variability explained by VAT (R(2) = 0.266) as compared to SAT (R(2) = 0.265), above and beyond traditional risk factors. VAT, but not SAT was associated with FMD% after adjusting for clinical covariates. Nevertheless, the differential association with VAT as compared to SAT was minimal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parikh et al. (2009) conducted a cross-sectional in Community-based volunteers (n=3,020). Visceral abdominal tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) was evaluated on Percentage of flow-mediated dilation (FMD%) (Inversely associated (R2 = 0.266 for VAT vs R2 = 0.265 for SAT), p=0.01). Visceral abdominal tissue was independently associated with impaired flow-mediated dilation, but it explained only a minimal proportion of the variability beyond traditional risk factors compared to subcutaneous fat.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: