BACKGROUND: Reinfection, a common occurrence with gonorrhea, may result from a lack of protective immune response, or from the tremendous gonococcal strain variation. GOAL: A two-phase study in human volunteers tested whether experimental infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae MS11mkC would protect against reinfection with the same organisms. STUDY DESIGN: In phase 1, an intraurethral inoculum of 57,000 piliated, transparent (opacity protein-negative [Opa-]) MS11mkC N gonorrhoeae infected 14 of 15 (93%) volunteers. The volunteers were encouraged to delay treatment for at least 5 days. In phase 2, which began 2 weeks after treatment for the initial infection, volunteers were inoculated with 7,100 piliated, Opa- MS11mkC. RESULTS: The phase 2 challenge infected 6 of 14 (43%) previously infected volunteers and 5 of 10 (50%) naïve control subjects. Phase 1 volunteers who resisted reinfection were significantly more likely to have had a fourfold or greater increase in lipooligosaccharide immunoglobulin G during phase 1 than those who did not resist reinfection (P = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Although infection did not provide protection from reinfection under the conditions used, the results suggest that immunity to reinfection is more complex than anticipated by the experimental design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmidt et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: