The reactivity and efficiency of five low molecular weight multifunctional anhydride and epoxy compounds as chemical modifiers of a bottle grade poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) resin were evaluated by reactive extrusion under controlled conditions. The two dianhydrides and the three epoxy compounds were used at concentrations based on stoichiometry derived from the measured carboxyl and hydroxyl end group contents of the base resin. Measures of melt viscosity, melt strength, intrinsic viscosity and carboxyl group content were used as criteria of the extent of the modification. Correlations of die pressure with extrudate swell during extrusion, and melt flow index (MFI) with melt strength by off‐line testing of the extrudates permitted the ranking of the modifiers according to their chain‐extending/branching efficiency. For some systems molecular weight increases (related to die pressure/MFI/intrinsic viscosity) accompanied by broadening of the molecular weight distribution (related to die swell/melt strength) were considered excessive. Extrusion foaming experiments with one particular dianhydride modifier that increased the intrinsic viscosity of the resin from 0.71 to 0.9 dl g −1 indicate that production of low‐density foams by a process involving one‐step reactive modification/gas injection foaming is feasible, at conditions not significantly different from those employed in the simple reactive modification of the PET resin. The rheological and structural parameters determined in this work may be used as criteria to specify PET foamable compositions in terms of types and concentrations of modifiers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xanthos et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: