In the present work, statistical (EOCs) and block (OBCs) ethylene‐octene copolymers, with similar densities and crystallinities, were used as impact modifiers of isotactic polypropylene (iPP), and the toughening effects of these two types of elastomers were compared. The viscosity curves of EOCs were similar to those of OBCs with equivalent melt flow rate (MFR), enabling a comparison of the viscosity ratio and elastomer type as independent variables. No distinct differences on the crystal forms and crystal perfection of iPP matrix in various blends were observed by thermal analysis. Morphological examination showed that OBCs form smaller dispersed domains than EOCs with similar MFRs. The flexural modulus, yield stress, stress and strain at break showed the same variation tendency for all the investigated polypropylene/elastomer blends. However, the room temperature Izod impact toughness of iPP/OBC blend was higher than that of iPP/EOC blend containing elastomer with the similar MFRs. The experimental results indicated that the compatibility of iPP/OBCs was much higher than that of iPP/EOCs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: