For number‐average molecular weight ( M n ) below 1 × 10 4 g mol −1 , the comparison of cold crystallization temperature and spherulite growth rate and crystallinity of linear 1‐arm, 2‐arm, and branched 4‐arm poly( L ‐lactide)/poly( D ‐lactide) blends exhibits that the effects of chain directional change and branching significantly disturb stereocomplex crystallization. In contrast, the comparison of glass transition and melting temperatures of linear 1‐arm, 2‐arm, and branched 4‐arm poly( L ‐lactide)/poly( D ‐lactide) blends indicates that the effects of chain directional change and branching insignificantly alter and largely increase the segmental mobility of the blends, respectively, and the crystalline thickness of the blends is determined by M n per one arm not by M n and is not affected by the molecular architecture. magnified image
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sakamoto et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: