The electronic structure of a series of η 1 -acetylide complexes containing electron-rich ruthenium centers is examined using approximate density functional theory. Calculations are performed on two series of complexes, Ru(C⋮CR)(PH 3 ) 2 (η 5 -C 5 H 5 ) and trans -Ru(C⋮CR)Cl(PH 3 ) 4, with a series of substituted acetylide ligands, R = H, C 6 H 5 and C 6 H 4 -4-NO 2 . The π back-bonding ability of the ligands increases in the order R = H < C 6 H 5 < C 6 H 4 -4-NO 2, while π donor properties vary as R = H < C 6 H 4 -4-NO 2 < C 6 H 5 . The cations of the complexes of the phenylacetylide ligand are therefore relatively stable, particularly when the vacancy at the metal center arises in an orbital coplanar with the phenyl π system. The nitrophenylacetylide ligand is a much weaker σ donor than either of the other two. Trends in calculated ionization energies result from a subtle interplay of changes in the σ donor, π donor, and π acceptor properties of the ligands and cannot be ascribed to one mechanism in isolation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McGrady et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: