This paper deals with coordination and profit division in a manufacturer–retailer supply chain with corporate social responsibility (CSR). Considering the retailer to be socially responsible in one case, and the manufacturer to be so in another, the paper applies a quantity discount contract to resolve channel conflict. It is found that the retailer's perfect welfare maximizing motive is enough for channel coordination. When a channel member is not the perfect welfare maximizer, a quantity discount contract cuts out channel conflict. The wholesale price of a quantity discount contract is different from that of a traditional profit maximizing supply chain. It may be equal to the manufacturer's decentralized wholesale price in one case, and negative for CSR above a certain threshold in another. Also, the manufacturer's pure profit may be negative if it puts a heavy weight on CSR. Using the Nash bargaining product, the surplus profit is divided between the channel members. It is found that, for pure profit, a channel member always prefers the other members to be corporately socially responsible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Panda et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: