PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1996Journal of Clinical Investigation65 citationsOpen Access

Paradoxical inhibition of cardiac lipid peroxidation in cancer patients treated with doxorubicin. Pharmacologic and molecular reappraisal of anthracycline cardiotoxicity.

GMGiorgio MinottiCMCesare MancusoAFAndrea Frustaci

Structured PICO

Does doxorubicin infusion alter cardiac lipid peroxidation in cancer patients?

P
Population
9 cancer patients undergoing intravenous treatments with doxorubicin, 10 non-cancer patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for arrhythmias or valvular dysfunctions (control), and myocardial biopsies from patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass grafting (in vitro experiments).
I
Intervention
Intravenous doxorubicin (standard dose 60 mg/m2, and fractionated dose of 13 mg/m2)
C
Comparator
Baseline levels before treatment, and non-cancer patients
O
Outcome
Lipid conjugated dienes (CD) and hydroperoxides in blood plasma samples from the coronary sinus and femoral arterysurrogate

Doxorubicin paradoxically inhibits rather than promotes cardiac lipid peroxidation in vivo, suggesting alternative mechanisms are responsible for anthracycline cardiotoxicity.

Abstract

Anticancer therapy with doxorubicin (DOX) and other quinone anthracyclines is limited by severe cardiotoxicity, reportedly because semiquinone metabolites delocalize Fe(II) from ferritin and generate hydrogen peroxide, thereby promoting hydroxyl radical formation and lipid peroxidation. Cardioprotective interventions with antioxidants or chelators have nevertheless produced conflicting results. To investigate the role and mechanism(s) of cardiac lipid peroxidation in a clinical setting, we measured lipid conjugated dienes (CD) and hydroperoxides in blood plasma samples from the coronary sinus and femoral artery of nine cancer patients undergoing intravenous treatments with DOX. Before treatment, CD were unexpectedly higher in coronary sinus than in femoral artery (342 +/- 131 vs 112 +/- 44 nmol/ml, mean +/- SD; P < 0.01), showing that cardiac tissues were spontaneously involved in lipid peroxidation. This was not observed in ten patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for the diagnosis of arrhythmias or valvular dysfunctions, indicating that myocardial lipid peroxidation was specifically increased by the presence of cancer. The infusion of a standard dose of 60 mg DOX/m(2) rapidly ( approximately 5 min) abolished the difference in CD levels between coronary sinus and femoral artery (134 +/- 95 vs 112 +/- 37 nmol/ml); moreover, dose fractionation studies showed that cardiac release of CD and hydroperoxides decreased by approximately 80% in response to the infusion of as little as 13 mg DOX/m(2). Thus, DOX appeared to inhibit cardiac lipid peroxidation in a rather potent manner. Corollary in vitro experiments were performed using myocardial biopsies from patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass grafting. These experiments suggested that the spontaneous exacerbation of lipid peroxidation probably involved preexisting Fe(II) complexes, which could not be sequestered adequately by cardiac isoferritins and became redox inactive when hydrogen peroxide was included to simulate DOX metabolism and hydroxyl radical formation. Collectively, these in vitro and in vivo studies provide novel evidence for a possible inhibition of cardiac lipid peroxidation in DOX-treated patients. Other processes might therefore contribute to the cardiotoxicity of DOX.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Minotti et al. (1996) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a6f4d22e36a167817e104b6https://doi.org/10.1172/jci118836
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper